Groundlearn / Case studies / Amaranth, 2006
Amaranth, 2006
Market liquidity and concentration risk
A spread trade too large to leave.
At a glance
| When | 2006 |
|---|---|
| Who | Amaranth Advisors, a multi-strategy hedge fund |
| Instruments | Natural gas calendar spreads on NYMEX and ICE |
| Loss | About $6.6bn in weeks |
| Risk type | Market liquidity and concentration risk |
What happened
Amaranth's energy book, run by a single trader, built huge positions in natural gas calendar spreads: long winter delivery months against short spring months, betting the gap would widen. By 2006 the fund held a large share of the open interest in the contracts it traded. In September the spreads collapsed, the fund lost about $6.6bn, then the largest hedge fund loss on record, and what remained of the book was transferred to JPMorgan and Citadel at a steep discount.
Why it went wrong
A spread has two offsetting legs, so exchanges margin it lightly, which is what let the fund carry such a large position. But the problem was its size relative to the market, not relative to capital. With so much of the open interest, there was nobody to sell to except at prices that moved the market against it. Moving positions to the then lightly regulated ICE platform avoided the position accountability levels that applied on NYMEX, a gap later closed by legislation.
What it teaches
A position that looks hedged is not necessarily small: low margin buys a much larger notional, and the loss when the legs stop moving together scales with it. Liquidity has to be measured against the depth of the market, not the size of the fund. A mark is only a price if someone would trade the whole position there.
Key terms
- Calendar spread
- Long one delivery month and short another in the same commodity, trading the gap rather than the level.
- Open interest
- The total number of contracts outstanding, and so the measure a position’s size should be read against.
- Spread margin
- The reduced margin charged on offsetting legs, on the assumption that they move together.
- Widow-maker
- The March–April natural gas spread, across the end of the withdrawal season, and its reputation for violence.
- Position limits
- Caps on how much of a contract one participant may hold, applied on a regulated exchange.
- Liquidation discount
- The gap between a portfolio’s marked value and what a buyer will pay to take it on whole.
Where it sits in the course
Case studies like this one are used throughout risk management teaching, including FRM® preparation, as worked examples of market liquidity and concentration risk. In OTC Learn the lesson runs in five steps: what happened, the position, why it broke, what it cost and what it teaches, followed by a worked example with the numbers. See the lesson outline.
The instruments behind it
OTC Learn lessons on the products this case turns on:
- Commodity SwapFixed price for floating market price
- Crack Spread SwapHedge the margin between crude and its products
- Swing OptionThe right to choose how much you take
Educational content only. Figures are from the public record, such as regulatory reports, commissioned reviews and court judgments, and estimates are described as such. This is not financial, investment, legal or regulatory advice.
Go deeper in OTC Learn
Amaranth, 2006 has a five-step lesson, a worked example with the numbers, and a bank of questions in OTC Learn, free to download on Android. The core catalogue of 36 products stays free; the case studies are part of the subscription.
About OTC LearnOr get a free question every day on the OTC Learn WhatsApp channel.
← Allied Irish Banks and Allfirst, 2002All case studiesSociété Générale, 2008 →