Groundlearn / Case studies / Barings, 1995
Barings, 1995
Operational risk: rogue trading and missing segregation of duties
One trader, both sides of his own desk.
At a glance
| When | 1995 |
|---|---|
| Who | Barings' Singapore futures desk |
| Instruments | Nikkei 225 futures and short straddles on the index |
| Loss | About £827m, more than the bank's capital |
| Risk type | Operational risk: rogue trading and missing segregation of duties |
What happened
Barings' Singapore office was meant to run low-risk arbitrage, buying Nikkei futures on one exchange and selling them on another for tiny price differences. Instead a single trader built a large, hidden directional position. After the Kobe earthquake on 17 January 1995 the Nikkei fell sharply, and the position was increased rather than cut. By late February the losses were larger than the bank's entire capital, and the 233-year-old firm was sold to ING for one pound.
Why it went wrong
The trader controlled both the trading and the settlement of his own book, so the records of what he had done were produced by him. Losses sat in an error account outside the reported numbers. Head office kept sending hundreds of millions to meet margin calls without reconciling what that money was paying for. Underneath were an outright long futures position and short straddles: a bet that the index would stay in a range, at a size nobody in London knew existed.
What it teaches
Profits that do not fit the strategy are a warning, not a success: a near-riskless arbitrage cannot produce large, steady gains. Money leaving the firm for margin can always be checked against positions. Separate front and back offices, mandatory leave and independent reconciliation became standard because all of them were missing here.
Key terms
- Segregation of duties
- Keeping trading, confirmation and settlement in separate hands so no one person can both trade and record.
- Error account
- An account for correcting mistaken bookings, and here the place concealed losses were parked.
- Short straddle
- Selling a call and a put at the same strike: premium now, unbounded loss if the market moves far.
- Index arbitrage
- Trading the same index future on two exchanges for a small price difference, with little directional risk.
- Reconciliation
- Checking the firm’s records against the exchange’s and the cash actually paid — the control that was absent.
- Operational risk
- Loss from failed processes, people or systems, as distinct from market or credit risk.
Where it sits in the course
Case studies like this one are used throughout risk management teaching, including FRM® preparation, as worked examples of operational risk: rogue trading and missing segregation of duties. In OTC Learn the lesson runs in five steps: what happened, the position, why it broke, what it cost and what it teaches, followed by a worked example with the numbers. See the lesson outline.
Related case studies
- Société Générale, 2008Fictitious hedges, and a €4.9bn exit
The instruments behind it
OTC Learn lessons on the products this case turns on:
- OTC Equity OptionA custom, bilaterally negotiated option
- Execution and ReportingHow a trade gets done, and who has to know about it
Educational content only. Figures are from the public record, such as regulatory reports, commissioned reviews and court judgments, and estimates are described as such. This is not financial, investment, legal or regulatory advice.
Go deeper in OTC Learn
Barings, 1995 has a five-step lesson, a worked example with the numbers, and a bank of questions in OTC Learn, free to download on Android. The core catalogue of 36 products stays free; the case studies are part of the subscription.
About OTC LearnOr get a free question every day on the OTC Learn WhatsApp channel.