Groundlearn / Case studies / Orange County, 1994
Orange County, 1994
Leverage and interest rate risk; collateral calls
A conservative bond portfolio, borrowed three times over.
At a glance
| When | 1994 |
|---|---|
| Who | The Orange County investment pool, serving about 200 local public bodies |
| Instruments | High-grade agency notes and structured notes such as inverse floaters, leveraged with repo |
| Loss | About $1.7bn and a Chapter 9 bankruptcy |
| Risk type | Leverage and interest rate risk; collateral calls |
What happened
Orange County ran a pooled fund for itself and roughly two hundred schools, cities and districts. The securities were high quality, mostly agency paper, but the pool borrowed against them through repurchase agreements until it held about $20bn of securities on around $7.5bn of deposits. Much of what it bought also had leverage written into the coupon. When US rates rose through 1994 the portfolio lost about $1.7bn, lenders demanded more collateral, and in December the county filed for bankruptcy, then the largest municipal failure in US history.
Why it went wrong
There were two layers of leverage, and rising rates hit both. Repo multiplied every price move by nearly three. Inverse floaters, whose coupons fall as short rates rise, behave like much longer bonds than their maturity suggests. As prices fell the repo lenders called for collateral, forcing sales into a falling market. And because the pool reported at book value rather than market value, the depositors had no warning until it was too late.
What it teaches
Credit quality and market risk are separate questions: a portfolio of safe issuers can still be a highly risky position once it is leveraged. Leverage hidden inside a coupon formula will not show up in any measure that only counts borrowing. Public funds now face leverage limits, maturity limits and mark-to-market reporting because of this case.
Key terms
- Repurchase agreement
- Selling a security for cash with an agreement to buy it back, the standard way to borrow against bonds.
- Inverse floater
- A note whose coupon falls as a benchmark rate rises, giving it far more interest rate risk than its maturity suggests.
- Effective duration
- The true price sensitivity of a structured note to rates, which can be several times its stated maturity.
- Collateral call
- A repo lender’s demand for more security as the collateral falls, met by selling into the same fall.
- Book value reporting
- Reporting holdings at cost rather than market, which conceals a loss until it must be realised.
- Investment pool
- A shared fund holding cash for several public bodies, whose participants here could not see the risk taken.
Where it sits in the course
Case studies like this one are used throughout risk management teaching, including FRM® preparation, as worked examples of leverage and interest rate risk; collateral calls. In OTC Learn the lesson runs in five steps: what happened, the position, why it broke, what it cost and what it teaches, followed by a worked example with the numbers. See the lesson outline.
Related case studies
- The gilt LDI crisis, 2022Pension hedges that worked, and could not be funded
The instruments behind it
OTC Learn lessons on the products this case turns on:
- Interest Rate SwapTrade fixed for floating payments
- Cap and FloorSet a ceiling or floor on a floating rate
Educational content only. Figures are from the public record, such as regulatory reports, commissioned reviews and court judgments, and estimates are described as such. This is not financial, investment, legal or regulatory advice.
Go deeper in OTC Learn
Orange County, 1994 has a five-step lesson, a worked example with the numbers, and a bank of questions in OTC Learn, free to download on Android. The core catalogue of 36 products stays free; the case studies are part of the subscription.
About OTC LearnOr get a free question every day on the OTC Learn WhatsApp channel.
← Bankers Trust and Procter & Gamble, 1994All case studiesBarings, 1995 →