Groundlearn / Case studies / Silicon Valley Bank, 2023
Silicon Valley Bank, 2023
Interest rate risk in the banking book and deposit run risk
Long bonds, unhedged, funded by deposits that could leave in a day.
At a glance
| When | March 2023 |
|---|---|
| Who | Silicon Valley Bank |
| Instruments | Long-dated Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities, with most rate hedges removed |
| Loss | Bank failure on 10 March 2023; all deposits guaranteed |
| Risk type | Interest rate risk in the banking book and deposit run risk |
What happened
Silicon Valley Bank's deposits roughly tripled to about $189bn between 2019 and 2021 as its technology clients raised record funding. With little loan demand, it bought long-dated Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities at the low yields of 2020 and 2021. Then the Federal Reserve raised rates at the fastest pace in decades. On 8 March 2023 the bank announced a loss-making securities sale and a capital raise; depositors asked to withdraw $42bn the next day, and regulators closed it on 10 March.
Why it went wrong
Most of the securities were held to maturity, carried at cost, so their falling value did not show in reported capital. By the end of 2022 unrealised losses of about $15bn were close to its $16bn of equity. The bank had removed most of its interest rate hedges during 2022, leaving the duration exposure open. About nine in ten deposits were above the insurance limit, held by a tightly connected client base that moved together once worry spread.
What it teaches
Duration risk is real whether or not the accounting shows it, and a bank whose depositors can leave overnight cannot count on holding bonds to maturity. Removing a hedge as rates rise turns it into a bet on rates falling. Concentrated, uninsured deposits are a liquidity risk in their own right, and the speed of a modern run belongs in the stress test.
Key terms
- Held to maturity
- An accounting classification that carries bonds at amortised cost, keeping market losses out of reported capital.
- Duration
- The sensitivity of a bond’s price to a change in yields, roughly the percentage price change per 1% move.
- Unrealised loss
- The fall in an asset’s market value below its carrying value, not yet crystallised by a sale.
- Uninsured deposits
- Deposits above the government insurance limit, whose holders have most reason to run.
- Interest rate swap hedge
- Paying fixed and receiving floating to offset the fall in value of fixed-rate assets as rates rise.
- Bank run
- Depositors withdrawing at once because they fear the bank cannot pay them all.
Where it sits in the course
Case studies like this one are used throughout risk management teaching, including FRM® preparation, as worked examples of interest rate risk in the banking book and deposit run risk. In OTC Learn the lesson runs in five steps: what happened, the position, why it broke, what it cost and what it teaches, followed by a worked example with the numbers. See the lesson outline.
Related case studies
- The gilt LDI crisis, 2022Pension hedges that worked, and could not be funded
The instruments behind it
OTC Learn lessons on the products this case turns on:
- Interest Rate SwapTrade fixed for floating payments
- DV01 and Rate RiskWhat one basis point is worth
Educational content only. Figures are from the public record, such as regulatory reports, commissioned reviews and court judgments, and estimates are described as such. This is not financial, investment, legal or regulatory advice.
Go deeper in OTC Learn
Silicon Valley Bank, 2023 has a five-step lesson, a worked example with the numbers, and a bank of questions in OTC Learn, free to download on Android. The core catalogue of 36 products stays free; the case studies are part of the subscription.
About OTC LearnOr get a free question every day on the OTC Learn WhatsApp channel.
← The gilt LDI crisis, 2022All case studiesCredit Suisse AT1 bonds, 2023 →